Key result
Mixed aortic stenosis linked to ~188% higher odds of post-TAVI aortic regurgitation versus pure AS.
Why the study?
Does mixed aortic stenosis compared to pure aortic stenosis worsen postprocedural aortic regurgitation and mortality in patients undergoing TAVI?
Cohort (n=1,062)
Yes
Does mixed aortic stenosis compared to pure aortic stenosis worsen postprocedural aortic regurgitation and mortality in patients undergoing TAVI?
Effect estimate: OR 2.882 (95% CI 1.851-4.488)
Absolute Event Rate: 42.6% vs 26.5%
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients undergoing TAVI, mixed aortic stenosis increases the risk of postprocedural aortic regurgitation and major bleeding but does not negatively impact long-term survival compared to pure aortic stenosis.
Associated higher post-TAVI AR in mixed AS should not yet change practice; leaves open optimal device strategies.
OBJECTIVES: We sought to evaluate the impact of mixed aortic stenosis (MAS) on postprocedural aortic regurgitation (PPAR) and clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). BACKGROUND: The impact of MAS of TAVI outcomes is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from a multicenter registry were retrospectively analysed. Outcomes were compared between patients with pure aortic stenosis (PAS; associated AR<1+/3+) and MAS (associated AR≥1+/3+). Study objectives were PPAR incidence and short- and long-term mortality. Overall, 1,062 patients were included: 419 (39.4%) with MAS and 643 (60.5%) with PAS. At 30 days, there were no differences in mortality, however, a higher incidence of major bleeding (22.7% vs. 16.8%; P=0.016), PPAR≥1+/3+ (42.6% vs. 26.5%; P<0.001) and lower device success (89.3% vs. 93.3%; P=0.019) was observed in patients with MAS. Of note, MAS was an independent predictor of PPAR≥1+/3+ at multivariable analysis (OR: 2.882; CI: 1.851-4.488; P<0.001). At 2 years of follow-up, no survival differences were present between MAS and PAS groups. Similarly, following stratification for PPAR≥1+/3+, MAS had no protective effect on survival as compared with PAS. CONCLUSIONS: MAS was associated with lower device success and higher PPAR incidence. However, despite these findings, it had no influence on long-term postoperative outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chieffo et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Aortic stenosis undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) (n=1,062). Mixed aortic stenosis (MAS) vs. Pure aortic stenosis (PAS) was evaluated on Postprocedural aortic regurgitation (PPAR) ≥1+/3+ (OR 2.882, 95% CI 1.851-4.488, p=<0.001). Mixed aortic stenosis in patients undergoing TAVI was associated with a higher incidence of postprocedural aortic regurgitation compared to pure aortic stenosis (42.6% vs 26.5%; OR 2.882; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: