Key result
Higher HbA1c and longer T2D duration link to reduced E/A values despite preserved LVEF.
Why the study?
The study aimed to explore the interplay between HbA1C levels, disease duration, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with T2DM and preserved ejection fraction.
Are HbA1C levels and diabetes duration associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved ejection fraction?
Cross-Sectional (n=152)
No
Are HbA1C levels and diabetes duration associated with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved ejection fraction?
Effect estimate: β=0.294 for HbA1C; β=0.319 for disease duration (E/A value)
p-value: p=<0.001
In patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved ejection fraction, higher HbA1C levels and longer disease duration are independently associated with worse left ventricular diastolic dysfunction.
May support closer diastolic monitoring in long-standing high-HbA1c T2DM; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
Background: We aimed to explore the intricate interplay between glycated hemoglobin (HbA1C) levels, disease duration, and left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) characterized by preserved ejection fraction. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Hebei Medical University from January 2022 to December 2022. A total of 114 inpatients from the Department of Endocrinology were randomly selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients with T2DM were stratified into three subgroups, each comprising 38 patients, based on disease duration and HbA1C levels. A sub-analysis was conducted to explore variations among these three distinct groups. A control group comprised 38 age, gender, body mass index (BMI), and smoking habit-matched healthy volunteers form the Physical Examination Center of the same hospital. General demographic information, biochemical results, and echocardiographic data were collected, and correlation and linear regression analyses were performed. Results: Diabetic patients exhibited lower E/A values (0.85 (0.72, 1.17) vs. 1.20 (0.97, 1.30)) and elevated E/e' values (9.50 (8.75, 11.00) vs. 9.00 (7.67, 9.85)) compared to their normal controls. In the subgroup analysis, patients with a disease duration exceeding 2 years displayed reduced E/A values (0.85 (0.75, 1.10) vs. 1.10 (0.80, 1.30)) and elevated E/e' values (9.80 (9.20, 10.80) vs. 8.95 (7.77, 9.50)) in comparison to those with a disease duration of ≤2 years, p<0.05. Among patients with a disease duration surpassing 2 years, those with higher HbA1C levels exhibited lower E/A values (0.80 (0.70, 0.90) vs. (0.85 (0.75, 1.10)) and higher E/e' values (11.00 (9.87, 12.15) vs. 9.80 (9.20, 10.80)) in contrast to patients with low HbA1C levels, p<0.05. Multiple linear regression analysis identified HbA1C (β=0.294, p<0.001) and disease duration (β=0.319, p<0.001) as independent risk factors for the E/A value in diabetes patients. Furthermore, HbA1C (β=0.178, p=0.015) and disease duration (β=0.529, p<0.001) emerged as independent risk factors for the E/e' value in diabetic patients. Conclusions: In individuals with T2DM exhibiting preserved ejection fraction, the presence of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction is significantly associated with HbA1C levels and the duration of diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus with preserved ejection fraction (n=152). HbA1C levels and disease duration vs. Healthy volunteers and low HbA1C/short duration subgroups was evaluated on Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (E/A and E/e' values) (β=0.294 for HbA1C; β=0.319 for disease duration (E/A value), p=<0.001). Higher HbA1C levels (β=0.294, p<0.001) and longer disease duration (β=0.319, p<0.001) were independent risk factors for reduced E/A values in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: