Why the study?
This research aimed to evaluate the impact of clinical and genetic factors on warfarin dose adjustment and to develop a dosing algorithm for patients with cardiovascular disease.
Do age, BMI, and CYP4F2 rs2108622 genotype significantly influence warfarin dose requirements in Indonesian cardiovascular patients?
Do age, BMI, and CYP4F2 rs2108622 genotype significantly influence warfarin dose requirements in Indonesian cardiovascular patients?
A pharmacodynamic model incorporating age, BMI, and CYP4F2 genotype can help tailor and predict warfarin dosing requirements for cardiovascular patients in Indonesia.
May support tailored warfarin dosing in Indonesian patients; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Purpose: . Therefore, this research aimed to evaluate the impact of clinical and genetic factors on warfarin dose adjustment and to develop a dosing algorithm for patients with cardiovascular disease. Patients and Methods: (sequencing). Statistical analyses included both bivariate and multivariate analyses (logistic regression) with a significance level set at <0.05. Results: Statistical analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the CC, CT, and TT genotypes were significantly associated with warfarin dose (p = 0.02). Furthermore, the Mann-Whitney test results showed that gender did not have a significant relationship with warfarin dose (p = 0.16). The Spearman Rank correlation test showed that age (p = 0.02) and BMI (p = 0.03) had significant relationships with warfarin dose (p < 0.05). However, gender (p = 0.89) had no effect, while age (p = 0.01), BMI (p = 0.01), and genotype (p = 0.01) significantly influenced warfarin dose determination. Conclusion: genotype (8.29%) to warfarin dose adjustment was 25%. The linear regression model for predicting warfarin dose was determined to be y = 12.736-0.16*age + 0.55*BMI + 3.55*genotype, where 1 = CC, 2 = CT, and 3 = TT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Putriana et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: