Why the study?
What is the quality of vitamin K antagonist control and its relationship with adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Population
Adult patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dose-adjusted vitamin K antagonists for ≥3 months. 95…
Design
Meta-analysis
Key result
Patients with atrial fibrillation receiving vitamin K antagonists spent only 61% of their time in the therapeutic INR range, with 57% of thromboembolic events occurring at an INR <2.0.
Authors
Loading...
Poor VKA control in AF heightens thromboembolic risk; confirms subtherapeutic INR drives events and supports optimized monitoring or NOAC preference.
Meta-Analysis
Yes
What is the quality of vitamin K antagonist control and its relationship with adverse outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Patients with atrial fibrillation on vitamin K antagonists frequently have INRs outside the therapeutic range, which is associated with increased risks of thromboembolism (INR <2.0) and hemorrhage (INR >3.0), particularly in community practice settings and VKA-naïve patients.
Mearns et al. (2014) conducted a meta-analysis in Atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists was evaluated on Time spent in therapeutic range (TTR) (95% CI 59-62). Patients with atrial fibrillation receiving vitamin K antagonists spent only 61% of their time in the therapeutic INR range, with 57% of thromboembolic events occurring at an INR <2.0.