Key result
In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with vitamin K antagonists, the mean time in therapeutic range was 60.15%, with 49.72% of patients having a TTR below 60%.
Why the study?
Vitamin K antagonists remain widely used for NVAF, but the effectiveness of VKA therapy and the factors affecting anticoagulation efficacy needed evaluation.
Observational (n=725)
No
In a real-world cohort of NVAF patients on vitamin K antagonists, nearly half had suboptimal time in therapeutic range (<60%), with hypertension, diabetes, and interacting medications predicting poorer anticoagulation control.
Background/Aim. Despite the introduction of new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivoroxaban, apixaban), vitamin K antagonists (VKA), such as warfarin and acenocoumarol are still the most widely used oral anticoagulants for the treatment of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The time in therapeutic range (TTR) represents a measure of the quality of the anticoagulant effect of these drugs, and it is considered that the lower value of TTR is associated with the adverse effects of therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate of the effectiveness of VKA therapy in patients with NVAF and to identify factors affecting the anticoagulation efficacy. Methods. A retrospective study was conducted on a population of 725 outpatients with NVAF, treated with VKA and followed in the Blood Transfusion Institute of Nis, Serbia, from January to December 2017. Laboratory control of the INR was done from capillary blood of patients on Thrombotrack Solo (Axis Shield, Norway) and Thrombostat (Behnk Elektronik, Germany). Targeted therapeutic INR was between 2.0 and 3.0. For each patient all available INR values were evaluated to calculate the individual TTR according to the Rosendaal method. Results. The study included a total of 725 patients with NVAF which had 6,105 INR measurements, what was 8.13 ? 2.47 INR measurements per patient. The mean value of TTR and was 60.15 ? 17.52%, but 49.72% of patients had TTR less than 60%. Patients were at high risk of thrombosis in 6.15% of time (INR < 1.5) and high risk of bleeding in 2.2% of time (INR > 4.5). The most significant independent factors affecting the quality of VKA therapy were gender, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus and the use of amiodarone and antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel). Conclusion. The TTR is undoubtedly useful indicator of the VKA treatment effectiveness. The most important predictors of poorer efficacy of VKA therapy are: arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, patients' gender and the use of amiodarone and antiplatelet drugs (aspirin, clopidogrel). To improve the quality of VKA therapy, education of patients and better collaboration with them, as well as a successful teamwork of clinicians are also imperative.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanojković et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) (n=725). Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) was evaluated on Time in therapeutic range (TTR). In patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with vitamin K antagonists, the mean time in therapeutic range was 60.15%, with 49.72% of patients having a TTR below 60%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: