Key result
Anticoagulant use is associated with similar ICH rates versus no anticoagulation in AF stroke patients.
Why the study?
To describe atrial fibrillation patient characteristics and anticoagulation patterns in stroke patients in Aotearoa.
Observational (n=2,379)
Yes
Effect estimate: aOR 0.99 (95% CI 0.55-1.80)
Absolute Event Rate: 8.1% vs 8.5%
p-value: p=0.99
One third of stroke patients with known atrial fibrillation were not taking an anticoagulant prior to admission, highlighting a significant missed opportunity for stroke prevention.
Similar ICH rates with anticoagulants in known-AF stroke patients may support safety; extends observational data but leaves optimal prevention open.
AIM: To describe atrial fibrillation (AF) patient characteristics and anticoagulation patterns in stroke patients in Aotearoa. METHODS: Reducing Ethnic and Geographic Inequities to Optimise New Zealand Stroke (REGIONS) Care study is a prospective, nation-wide observational study of consecutive adult stroke patients admitted to hospital between 1 May and 31 October 2018. AF and anticoagulation prescribing, intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) and differences by Māori ethnicity and hospital location are described. RESULTS: Of 2,379 patients, 807 (34.3%) had a diagnosis of AF. AF patients were older than non-AF patients (mean 79.9 [SD 11] versus 72.5 [14.2], p<0.0001). AF was diagnosed before stroke in 666 patients (82.5%), of whom 442 (66.4%) were taking an anticoagulant. The most common documented reasons for non-anticoagulation were prior bleeding (20.5%), patient preference (18.1%), frailty, comorbidities/side effects (13.2%) and falls (6.8%). The ICH rate was similar for AF patients on versus not on an anticoagulant (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.80). Rates and reasons for oral anticoagulant non-prescribing were similar for Māori, non-Māori, urban and non-urban populations. CONCLUSIONS: Although anticoagulation prescribing in AF has improved, one third of stroke patients with known AF were not taking an anticoagulant prior to admission and the majority did not appear to have an absolute contraindication offering a multidisciplinary opportunity for improvement. There were no significant differences for Māori and non-urban populations in anticoagulant prescribing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ranta et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Stroke and Atrial Fibrillation (n=2,379). Anticoagulation vs. No anticoagulation was evaluated on Intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) (aOR 0.99, 95% CI 0.55-1.80, p=0.99). Among stroke patients with known atrial fibrillation, the rate of intracerebral haemorrhage was similar between those taking an anticoagulant and those not taking an anticoagulant (aOR 0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: