Key result
Dabigatran linked to ~58% lower intracranial hemorrhage risk vs warfarin in AF patients with falls.
Why the study?
Falls raise concern regarding the risk-benefit balance of anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation, motivating an evaluation of outcomes after falls or head injury and the safety of dabigatran.
Does dabigatran reduce intracranial hemorrhage compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation who experience falls or head injury?
Observational (n=18,113)
Does dabigatran reduce intracranial hemorrhage compared to warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation who experience falls or head injury?
Effect estimate: HR 0.42 (95% CI 0.18-0.98)
In anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation who experience falls, dabigatran is associated with a significantly lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared to warfarin.
May support dabigatran preference among fall-prone AF patients; leaves open prospective confirmation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Falls are always a concern regarding the balance of risk/benefit in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with anticoagulants. In this analysis, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of patients that had a fall/head injury reported in the RE-LY clinical trial (Randomized Evaluation of Long-Term Anticoagulation Therapy) and to explore the safety of dabigatran (a nonvitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant). METHODS: We performed a post hoc retrospective analysis of intracranial hemorrhage and major bleeding outcomes in the RE-LY trial with 18 113 individuals with atrial fibrillation, according to the status occurrence of falls (or head injury) reported as adverse events. Multivariate Cox regression models were used to provide adjusted hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI. RESULTS: In the study, 974 falls or head injury events were reported among 716 patients (4%). These patients were older and had more frequently comorbidities such as diabetes, previous stroke, or coronary artery disease. Patients with fall had a higher risk of major bleeding (HR, 2.41 [95% CI, 1.90-3.05]), intracranial hemorrhage (HR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.35-2.13]), and mortality (HR, 3.91 [95% CI, 2.51-6.10]) compared to those who did not have reported falls or head injury. Among patients who had falls, those allocated to dabigatran showed a lower intracranial hemorrhage risk (HR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.18-0.98]) compared with warfarin. CONCLUSIONS: In this population, the risk of falls is important and confers a worse prognosis, increasing intracranial hemorrhage, and major bleeding. Patients who fell and were under dabigatran was associated with lower intracranial hemorrhage risk than those anticoagulated with warfarin, but the analysis was merely exploratory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caldeira et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=18,113). Dabigatran vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Intracranial hemorrhage among patients who had falls (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.98). Among atrial fibrillation patients who experienced falls, dabigatran was associated with a lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage compared with warfarin (HR 0.42; 95% CI 0.18-0.98).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: