OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the expression of lymphoid enhancer factor 1 (LEF1) and β-catenin in basal cell adenoma (BA), desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF), and pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) to evaluate their diagnostic utility in tumors associated with the WNT/β-catenin signaling pathway harboring the mutation of CTNNB1 gene 3 exon. METHODS: Eighty tumor patients, including 26 BAs, 30 DFs, and 24 SPNs, were analyzed. Immunohistochemical staining was identified positive (nuclear staining of LEF1 and β-catenin in > 50% of tumor cells). The diagnostic rate of LEF1 alone, β-catenin alone, and their combination were compared for each tumor type and all patients. RESULTS: Compared to β-catenin, when LEF1 alone was used for diagnosis, the diagnostic rate increased by 46.16% for BA, 16.67% for SPN, and 11.25% for all patients, but decreased by 23.34% for DF. The combined use of β-catenin and LEF1 significantly increased the diagnostic ratio in BA (46.16%), SPN (16.67%), and all patients (21.25%), but only marginally in DF (3.33%). In terms of all WNT pathway tumors with CTNNB1 gene mutation encompassed by our study, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference between LEF1 alone and β-catenin alone. However, their combined application was highly significant (P = 0.001) . CONCLUSION: While β-catenin is commonly used as a marker for WNT pathway tumors, its variable expression and localization can be challenging for diagnosis. Our study emphasizes the importance of LEF1 as a complementary marker to β-catenin in diagnosing BA, DF, SPN, and other WNT pathway tumors activated by exon 3 CTNNB1 gene mutation. The combined use of LEF1 and β-catenin enhances diagnostic accuracy and may help the identification of these tumor types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: