PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 27, 1997New England Journal of Medicine1,020 citationsOpen Access

Prophylactic Use of Implanted Cardiac Defibrillators in Patients at High Risk for Ventricular Arrhythmias after Coronary-Artery Bypass Graft Surgery

View Full Paper
JBJ. Thomas Bigger

Key Result

Prophylactic implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator at the time of elective coronary bypass surgery did not improve overall mortality compared to control (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.81-1.42; P=0.64).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=900)

Multicenter

Yes

Structured PICO

Does prophylactic implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators improve survival in patients with coronary heart disease, depressed LVEF, and abnormal signal-averaged ECGs undergoing elective CABG?

P
Population
900 patients <80 years old with coronary heart disease, left ventricular ejection fraction <0.36, and abnormalities on signal-averaged electrocardiograms, scheduled for elective coronary bypass surgery.
I
Intervention
Prophylactic implantation of cardioverter-defibrillator at the time of coronary-artery bypass surgery
C
Comparator
Control group (no prophylactic ICD)
O
Outcome
Overall mortalityhard clinical

Prophylactic ICD implantation at the time of elective CABG does not improve survival in patients with reduced LVEF and abnormal signal-averaged ECGs.

Main Result

Effect estimate: HR 1.07 (95% CI 0.81-1.42)

Absolute Event Rate: 22.6% vs 20.9%

p-value: p=0.64

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with coronary heart disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and abnormalities on signal-averaged electrocardiograms have an increased risk sudden death. We evaluated the effect on survival of the prophylactic implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators in such patients at the time of coronary-artery bypass surgery. METHODS: Over the course of five years, 37 clinical centers screened all patients who were scheduled for elective coronary bypass surgery. Patients were eligible for the trial if they were less than 80 years old, had a left ventricular ejection fraction of less than 0.36, and had abnormalities on signal-averaged electrocardiograms. We identified 1422 eligible patients, enrolled 1055, and randomly assigned 900 to therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (446 patients) or to the control group (454 patients). The primary end point of the study was overall mortality, and the two groups were compared in an intention-to-treat analysis. RESULTS: The base-line characteristics of the two groups were similar. During an average follow-up of 32+/-16 months, there were 101 deaths in the defibrillator group (71 from cardiac causes) and 95 in the control group (72 from cardiac causes). The hazard ratio for death from any cause was 1.07 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.81 to 1.42; P=0.64). There was no statistically significant interaction between defibrillator therapy and any of 10 preselected base-line covariates. CONCLUSIONS: We found no evidence of improved survival among patients with coronary heart disease, a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction, and an abnormal signal-averaged electrocardiogram in whom a defibrillator was implanted prophylactically at the time of elective coronary bypass surgery.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

J. Thomas Bigger (1997) conducted an RCT in Coronary heart disease with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary-artery bypass surgery (n=900). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) vs. Control group was evaluated on Overall mortality (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.81-1.42, p=0.64). Prophylactic implantation of a cardioverter-defibrillator at the time of elective coronary bypass surgery did not improve overall mortality compared to control (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.81-1.42; P=0.64).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08585a1e8b9db648de0171https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm199711273372201
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper