Key result
Implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction significantly improved 5-year survival to 83% compared to 67% without an ICD.
Why the study?
Does ICD implantation improve survival in patients with severe LV dysfunction (EF ≤ 25%) who underwent CABG?
Cohort (n=305)
No
Does ICD implantation improve survival in patients with severe LV dysfunction (EF ≤ 25%) who underwent CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: 83% vs 67%
p-value: p=<0.05
Implantation of an ICD after CABG in patients with severe LV dysfunction (EF ≤ 25%) and clinical evidence of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia significantly improves short- and long-term survival.
May support post-CABG ICD use in severe LV dysfunction; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
OBJECTIVE: Patients with severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction have a poor long term survival despite complete surgical revascularization. Recent data suggests that the use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) improves survival in patients with severe LV dysfunction. We compared the survival impact of ICD implantation in patients with severe LV dysfunction who underwent CABG. METHODS: Between January 1996 and August 2004, 305 patients with LV ejection fraction (EF) < or = 25% had CABG surgery at our institution. Demographics of patients who had received an ICD (ICD+) in the post -operative period was compared to those without ICD (ICD-). Survival was evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: Of the entire group, 35 (11.5%) patients received an ICD with a median of 2 (+/-2) years after CABG. Indication for ICD implantation was clinical evidence of non sustained ventricular tachycardia (NSVT). There were no differences between the 2 groups with respect to age, gender, NYHA classification, number of bypasses, or other co-morbidities. Survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 88%, 79%, and 67% for the ICD- group compared to 94%, 89% and 83% for the ICD+ group, respectively (figure, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Implantation of ICD after CABG confers improved short and long term survival benefit to patients with severe LV dysfunction. Prophylactic ICD implantation in the setting of severe LV dysfunction and CABG surgery should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al‐Dadah et al. (2007) conducted a cohort in Severe left ventricular dysfunction (n=305). Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) vs. No ICD was evaluated on 5-year survival (p=<0.05). Implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction significantly improved 5-year survival to 83% compared to 67% without an ICD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: