Key result
Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after CABG occurred in 29.2% of patients and was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35-0.96; p=0.03).
Why the study?
Although EF may improve after CABG in ICD-eligible patients, the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of this improvement remain unclear.
Does coronary artery bypass graft surgery improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with EF ≤ 35% eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
Cohort (n=427)
Does coronary artery bypass graft surgery improve left ventricular ejection fraction in patients with EF ≤ 35% eligible for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator?
Nearly one-third of ICD-eligible patients with EF ≤ 35% experience significant EF improvement 4 months after CABG, which is associated with reduced mortality and supports reassessing EF before primary prevention ICD implantation.
LVEF improvement post-CABG may stratify lower-risk patients; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
INTRODUCTION: Left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) ≤ 35% is the cornerstone criterion for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) eligibility. Improvement in EF may occur in ICD-eligible patients after coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). However, the incidence, predictors, and outcomes of this process are unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: We studied 427 patients with EF ≤ 35% who underwent CABG in the Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial and had a systematic pre- and postoperative (4 months) EF assessment using the identical cardiac imaging modality. All imaging studies were interpreted at a core laboratory. Improvement in EF was defined as postoperative EF > 35% and >5% absolute improvement from baseline. Of the 427 patients (mean age 61.8 ± 9.5 and 50 women), 125 (29.2%) had EF improvement. Their mean EF increased from 26.8% (±5.8%) to 43.3% (±6.5%) (p < .0001). EF improvement occurred in only 20% of patients with a preoperative EF < 25%. The odds of EF improvement were 1.96 times higher (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-4.23, p = .09) in patients with myocardial viability. In adjusted analyses, EF improvement was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.96; p = .03) and heart failure mortality (HR: 0.31, 95% CI: 0.11-0.87; p = .027). CONCLUSION: Nearly 1/3rd of ICD-eligible patients undergoing CABG had significant improvement in EF, obviating the need for primary prevention ICD implantation. These results provide patients and clinicians data on the likelihood of ICD eligibility after CABG and support the practice of reassessment of EF after revascularization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adabağ et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Ischemic heart failure with EF ≤ 35% (n=427). Improvement in ejection fraction (EF > 35% and >5% absolute improvement) vs. No improvement in EF was evaluated on All-cause mortality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.35-0.96, p=0.03). Improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction after CABG occurred in 29.2% of patients and was associated with a lower risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.58; 95% CI 0.35-0.96; p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: