Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML) is a severe, disabling infection caused by JC virus reactivation. PML-related disability complicates the MRI monitoring needed to assess treatment interventions in clinical trial or compassionate use settings. Portable ultra-low-field MRI (pULF-MRI) offers a convenient approach when such frequent imaging is needed. We evaluated the potential utility of pULF-MRI as an adjunctive tool for decreasing the burden of clinical study participation and clinical management in PML. METHODS: We examined paired high-field (HF) and pULF-MRI scans from 11 patients, aged 49 ± 15 years. pULF-MRI images with corresponding HF-MRI were coupled to depict key imaging findings of PML, including three patients with longitudinal evaluations, one with bedside pULF-MRI. The images were then independently assessed by two blinded raters, not involved in image acquisition or initial evaluations, who sequentially rated diagnostic accuracy of pULF-MRI scans compared to the HF-MRI. Longitudinal evaluations were performed for three patients, one with bedside pULF-MRI. RESULTS: T2-FLAIR lesions were detected with pULF-ULF in all cases when present on HF-MRI. Median sensitivity and specificity were 62% and 100%, respectively. T1WI hypointense areas showed similar performance. Focal volume loss was present in 8/11 HF-MRI scans, with sensitivity and specificity of detection by pULF-MRI of 100% and 94%, respectively. Contrast enhancement was seen in a single case on both pULF- and HF-MRI. Follow-up pULF-MRI showed lesion changes in two cases, and stable findings in one case, consistent with HF-MRI. DISCUSSION: pULF-MRI shows promise in evaluation and monitoring of PML, showing moderate-to-high accuracy even when evaluations were unaided by HF-MRI. Our results highlight a potential application of pULF-MRI for facilitating participation in PML clinical research and more generally as a way to reduce burden of clinical management for this disabled patient population.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Okar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: