Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
It has been posited that teachers' professional vision reflects their pedagogical competence and expertise; however, the empirical evidence supporting these claims remains inadequate to construct comprehensive research-based knowledge of teachers' professional vision as a background mechanism underpinning their classroom interactions. To develop high-quality classroom interactions that support student learning, we need insight into teachers’ professional vision behind their practices in classroom interactions. This study explored the extent to which teachers’ knowledge-based reasoning – a component of their professional vision – is linked to the quality of observed classroom interactions during lessons. Finnish grade 2 teachers’ lessons ( N = 50) were investigated. Employing a mixed-method approach, classroom lessons were explored from two perspectives: (1) from the teacher's own perspective, using the gaze-cued retrospective think-aloud method; and (2) from an objective perspective, using video-recorded classroom observation and evaluated using the Classroom Assessment Scoring System (CLASS K-3; Pianta et al., 2008). Diverse aspects of teachers' knowledge-based reasoning were found to predict the dimensions of emotional support and classroom organisation observed in classroom lessons. Associations between teachers’ knowledge-based reasoning and the dimensions of instructional support were scant. The knowledge-based reasoning behind teachers' classroom actions is reflected – in particular – in the quality of the emotional support they provide and the classroom organisation they demonstrate. However, supporting teachers’ professional vision and advancing their instructionally supportive classroom interactions warrant careful attention. • Teachers' professional vision is reflected in their observed classroom interactions. • Knowledge-based reasoning predicted the dimensions of emotional support and classroom organisation. • Teachers' perspectives were studied with the gaze-cued think-aloud method. • Objective perspective was studied through classroom observations. • Think-aloud methodology and classroom observations can complement each other.
Muhonen et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: