Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines spontaneous epileptogenicity in mice with overexpressed alpha1B-ARs, suggesting implications for epilepsy understanding.
PURPOSE: A lack of selective alpha1-adrenergic receptor (alpha1-ARs) agonists and antagonists has made it difficult to clarify the precise function of these receptors in the CNS. We recently generated transgenic mice that overexpress either wild-type or a constitutively active mutant alpha 1B-AR in tissues that normally express the receptor. Both wild-type and mutant mice showed an age-progressive neurodegeneration with locomotor impairment and probable stress-induced motor events, which can be partially reversed by alpha 1-AR antagonists. We hypothesized that the wild-type and mutant mice may exhibit spontaneous epileptogenicity as compared with normal (nontransgenic) mice. METHODS: Normal, wild-type, and mutant mice were studied. Twenty mice (1 year old) underwent prolonged video-EEG monitoring over a 4-week period. Raw EEG data were blindly analyzed by visual inspection for the presence of interictal and ictal epileptic activities. RESULTS: During the acute postoperative period (< or = 3 days), both wild-type (26.1 +/- 8.07 spikes/day) and mutant mice (116.87 +/- 55.13) exhibited more frequent interictal spikes than did normal mice (2.17 +/- 0.75; p value, <0.05), but all three groups showed EEG and clinical seizures. During the later monitoring periods (>3 days), wild-type and mutant mice showed more frequent interictal spikes (15.44 +/- 4.07; p < 0.01; and 6.05 +/- 2.46; p < 0.05, respectively) as compared with normal mice (0.41 +/- 0.41), but only mutant mice had spontaneous clinical seizures (means +/- SEM). CONCLUSIONS: The selective overexpression of the alpha 1B-AR is associated with increased in vivo spontaneous interictal epileptogenicity and EEG/behavioral seizures. These results suggest a possible role (direct or indirect) for the alpha 1B-ARs in the development and expression of epileptogenicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kunieda et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: