Key result
Expert review addresses 10 key questions for managing cardiac amyloidosis complications.
Why the study?
Cardiac amyloidosis causes significant morbidity and mortality from heart failure, arrhythmias, and conduction disturbances, requiring guidance on drug choices, device implantation, and advanced therapies.
How should complications of cardiac amyloidosis be managed?
How should complications of cardiac amyloidosis be managed?
This review provides a practical 10-question guide for clinicians on managing complications of cardiac amyloidosis, including heart failure, arrhythmias, and conduction disturbances.
May inform management of cardiac amyloidosis complications; leaves open need for prospective validation.
Amyloidosis is a systemic disorder characterized by extracellular deposition of insoluble fibrils. The most common forms are amyloid light chain and amyloid transthyretin (ATTR) amyloidoses. Cardiac involvement may be found in both these forms, and is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The clinical presentation of cardiac amyloidosis (CA) may be represented by congestive heart failure (HF), possibly progressing to end-stage HF, as well as atrial fibrillation with possible thromboembolic events, and also conduction disturbances related to amyloid infiltration of conduction fibres. Beyond therapies targeting the blood dyscrasia or the ATTR amyloidogenic cascade, a careful choice of drug therapies, need for device implantation, and possibly treatments for advanced HF is then warranted. In the present review, we try to provide a useful guide to clinicians treating patients with CA by enucleating 10 main questions and answering them based on the evidence available as well as expert opinion and our clinical experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aimo et al. (2020) conducted a review in Cardiac amyloidosis. Management of complications was evaluated. This review provides a clinical guide for managing complications of cardiac amyloidosis, addressing 10 key questions based on available evidence and expert opinion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: