Key result
Deep learning model using ECG identifies STEMI and NSTEMI, achieving a ~0.99 C-statistic for STEMI.
Why the study?
Deep learning models have shown promise in ECG classification in managed settings, but high-performing models for diagnosing myocardial infarction in real-world emergency department scenarios are lacking.
Does a deep learning model using ECG, age, and sex accurately predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients?
Observational (n=214,250)
Yes
Does a deep learning model using ECG, age, and sex accurately predict myocardial infarction in emergency department patients?
A deep learning model using ECG, age, and sex demonstrated excellent discrimination for STEMI and NSTEMI in a real-world emergency department population, suggesting potential value for clinical decision support.
May support AI-assisted MI detection in ED ECGs; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Myocardial infarction diagnosis is a common challenge in the emergency department. In managed settings, deep learning-based models and especially convolutional deep models have shown promise in electrocardiogram (ECG) classification, but there is a lack of high-performing models for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in real-world scenarios. We aimed to train and validate a deep learning model using ECGs to predict myocardial infarction in real-world emergency department patients. We studied emergency department patients in the Stockholm region between 2007 and 2016 that had an ECG obtained because of their presenting complaint. We developed a deep neural network based on convolutional layers similar to a residual network. Inputs to the model were ECG tracing, age, and sex; and outputs were the probabilities of three mutually exclusive classes: non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), and control status, as registered in the SWEDEHEART and other registries. We used an ensemble of five models. Among 492,226 ECGs in 214,250 patients, 5,416 were recorded with an NSTEMI, 1,818 a STEMI, and 485,207 without a myocardial infarction. In a random test set, our model could discriminate STEMIs/NSTEMIs from controls with a C-statistic of 0.991/0.832 and had a Brier score of 0.001/0.008. The model obtained a similar performance in a temporally separated test set, and achieved a C-statistic of 0.985 and a Brier score of 0.002 in discriminating STEMIs from controls in an external test set. We developed and validated a deep learning model with excellent performance in discriminating between control, STEMI, and NSTEMI on the presenting ECG of a real-world sample of the important population of all-comers to the emergency department. Hence, deep learning models for ECG decision support could be valuable in the emergency department.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gustafsson et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Myocardial infarction (n=214,250). Deep learning ECG-based prediction model vs. Control status (no myocardial infarction) was evaluated on Discrimination of STEMIs and NSTEMIs from controls (C-statistic 0.991 for STEMI, 0.832 for NSTEMI). A deep learning model using ECG, age, and sex discriminated STEMI and NSTEMI from controls with C-statistics of 0.991 and 0.832, respectively, in emergency department patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: