Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Assuming volume equations with multiplicative errors, we derive simple conditions for determining when measurement error in total height is large enough that only using tree diameter, rather than both diameter and height, is more reliable for predicting tree volumes. Based on data for different tree species of excurrent form, we conclude that measurement errors up to ±40% of the true height can be tolerated before inclusion of estimated height in volume prediction is no longer warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Williams et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: