PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 7, 2013EP Europace87 citationsOpen Access

Characteristics of a large sample of candidates for permanent ventricular pacing included in the Biventricular Pacing for Atrio-ventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization Study (BioPace)

RFR. FunckHMH. MuellerMLMaurizio Lunati

Key Result

Candidates for permanent ventricular pacing in the BioPace study were predominantly male (68%) with advanced age (mean 73.5 years) and preserved left ventricular systolic function (mean LVEF 55.4%).

Study Design

Type

RCT (n=1,808)

Multicenter

Yes

PICO

P
Population
Candidates for permanent ventricular pacing (n=1,808)
I
Intervention / Comparator
Biventricular pacing

Abstract

AIMS: The general clinical profile of European pacemaker recipients who require predominant ventricular pacing (VP) is scarcely known. We examined the demographic and clinical characteristics of the 1808 participants (out of 1833 randomized patients) of the ongoing Biventricular Pacing for Atrio-ventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace) study. METHODS AND RESULTS: BioPace recruited patients between May 2003 and September 2007 predominantly in European medical centres. We analysed demographic data and described clinical characteristics and electrophysiological parameters prior to device implantation in 1808 enrolled patients. The mean age ± standard deviation (SD) of the 1808 patients was 73.5 ± 9.2 years, 1235 (68%) were men, 654 (36%) presented without structural heart disease, 547 (30%) had ischemic, 355 (20%) hypertensive, 146 (8%) valvular, and 102 (6%) non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 55.4 ± 12.3%. The main pacing indications were (a) permanent and intermittent atrioventricular (AV) block in 973 (54%), (b) atrial fibrillation with slow ventricular rate in 313 (17%), and (c) miscellaneous bradyarrhythmias in 522 (29%) patients. Mean QRS duration was 118.5 ± 30.5 ms, left bundle branch block was present in 316 (17%), and atrial tachyarrhythmias in 426 (24%) patients. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this sample is a representative source of description of the general profile of European pacemaker recipients who require predominant VP. Patients' characteristics included advanced age, predominantly male gender, preserved left ventricular systolic function, high-grade AV block, narrow QRS complex, and atrial tachyarrhythmias, the latter being present in nearly one-fourth of the cohort.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Funck et al. (2013) conducted an RCT in Candidates for permanent ventricular pacing (n=1,808). Biventricular pacing was evaluated. Candidates for permanent ventricular pacing in the BioPace study were predominantly male (68%) with advanced age (mean 73.5 years) and preserved left ventricular systolic function (mean LVEF 55.4%).

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a0869129a6c4ba6e6109be9https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eut343
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Biventricular stimulation to prevent cardiac desynchronization: rationale, design, and endpoints of the ‘Biventricular Pacing for Atrioventricular Block to Prevent Cardiac Desynchronization (BioPace)’ study2006 · 123 citations
  2. 2How harmful is right ventricular pacing? The question revived by the BioPace trial2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Patient Selection for Biventricular Pacing2002 · 92 citations
  4. 4Biventricular vs. right ventricular pacing devices in patients anticipated to require frequent ventricular pacing (BioPace)2025 · 19 citations
  5. 5Optimizing Patient Selection for Physiological Pacing in Bradyarrhythmia: Factors Associated With High Ventricular Pacing Burden2024 · 4 citations