Key result
Elevated lipoprotein(a) ≥50 mg/dL was associated with a significantly increased risk of incident ASCVD compared to levels <10 mg/dL (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.15-1.50; p<0.001).
Why the study?
Elevated lipoprotein(a) is associated with increased ASCVD incidence, but the modifying effect of high-sensitivity CRP and risk variability among clinical subgroups is unclear.
Does elevated Lp(a) increase the risk of incident ASCVD in individuals free of baseline ASCVD, and does hs-CRP modify this association?
Cohort (n=15,933)
Yes
Does elevated Lp(a) increase the risk of incident ASCVD in individuals free of baseline ASCVD, and does hs-CRP modify this association?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with increased ASCVD risk, particularly in individuals with concomitantly elevated hs-CRP levels and those at intermediate 10-year ASCVD risk.
Background/Objectives: Elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is associated with increased incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). We aimed to assess the utility of Lp(a) as an ASCVD risk-enhancing factor, as recommended by the 2019 ACC/AHA guidelines on ASCVD primary prevention, and to determine whether C-reactive protein (CRP) modifies the association of elevated Lp(a) with ASCVD risk. Methods: Lp(a), high sensitivity CRP (hs-CRP), and other ASCVD risk factors, including blood lipids, blood pressure, diabetes status, body weight and height, and smoking, were measured in 15,933 participants (median age 61.7 years with 25th–75th percentiles 57–68 years, 56.7% female, 19.7% Black, free of ASCVD at baseline) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study, Framingham Offspring Study, and Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis. Participants were followed for 10 years for incident ASCVD (coronary heart disease (CHD) or stroke) and CHD (including angioplasty and/or coronary artery bypass but minus stroke). These endpoints occurred in 9.7% and 7.4% of subjects, respectively. Results: Compared with the lowest Lp(a) category (<10 mg/dL), the highest Lp(a) category (≥50 mg/dL) carried a significantly increased incidence of ASCVD (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15–1.50; p < 0.001) and CHD (HR = 1.49; 95%CI 1.27–1.75; p < 0.001). The association of elevated Lp(a) with incident ASCVD was stronger in males and non-Black individuals and was independent of diabetes status. Lp(a) levels ≥ 50 mg/dL predicted the 10-year ASCVD risk for those at intermediate risk (≥7.5%, HR = 1.32; 95%CI 1.15–1.52; p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between Lp(a) and hs-CRP; individuals with concomitant elevated levels of Lp(a) and hs-CRP had the highest ASCVD risk. Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) levels were associated with increased ASCVD risk, particularly in individuals with concomitantly elevated hs-CRP levels and those at intermediate 10-year ASCVD risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoogeveen et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=15,933). Elevated lipoprotein(a) (≥50 mg/dL) vs. Lipoprotein(a) <10 mg/dL was evaluated on Incident ASCVD (coronary heart disease or stroke) (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.50, p=< 0.001). Elevated lipoprotein(a) ≥50 mg/dL was associated with a significantly increased risk of incident ASCVD compared to levels <10 mg/dL (HR 1.31; 95% CI 1.15-1.50; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: