Key result
LAA exclusion offers an effective stroke prevention alternative for AF patients with OAC contraindications.
Why the study?
Some patients with AF cannot receive first-line oral anticoagulants due to contraindications, making left atrial appendage exclusion an alternative for stroke prevention.
Do left atrial appendage exclusion techniques prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who have contraindications to oral anticoagulants?
Do left atrial appendage exclusion techniques prevent stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation who have contraindications to oral anticoagulants?
Surgical and percutaneous LAA exclusion techniques are effective alternatives for stroke prevention in AF patients with contraindications to oral anticoagulants.
Supports LAA exclusion consideration in anticoagulant-intolerant AF; leaves open need for randomized confirmation before practice change.
Although oral anticoagulants (OACs) are first-line therapy for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), some patients cannot be treated with OACs due to absolute or relative contraindications. Left atrial appendage (LAA) exclusion techniques have been developed over the years as a therapeutic alternative for stroke prevention. In this paper, we review the evolution of surgical techniques, employed as an adjunct to cardiac surgery or as a stand-alone procedure, as well as the recently introduced and widely utilized percutaneous LAA occlusion techniques. Until recently, data on surgical LAAO were limited and based on non-randomized studies. We focus on recently published randomized data which strongly support an add-on surgical LAAO in eligible patients during cardiac surgery and could potentially change current practice guidelines. In recent years, the trans-catheter techniques for LAA occlusion have emerged as another, less invasive alternative for patients who cannot tolerate oral anticoagulation. We review the growing body of evidence from prospective studies and registries, focusing on the two systems which are in widespread clinical use nowadays: the Watchman and Amulet type devices. These data show favorable results for both Watchman and Amulet devices, setting them as an important tool in our arsenal for stroke reduction in AF patients, especially in those who have contraindications for OACs. A better understanding of the different therapeutic alternatives, their specific benefits, and downfalls in different patient populations can guide us in tailoring the optimal therapeutic approach for stroke reduction in our AF patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rozen et al. (2022) conducted a review in Atrial fibrillation. Left atrial appendage exclusion vs. Oral anticoagulants was evaluated. Left atrial appendage exclusion techniques, including surgical and percutaneous approaches, offer an effective alternative for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation, particularly those with contraindications to oral anticoagulants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: