Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
/L-may be too stringent. We reviewed outcomes of 176 multiple myeloma (MM) patients diagnosed between 1971 and 2016, and who had CPCs detectable at diagnosis, to determine whether a lower threshold could be used to diagnose PCL. Median overall survival (mOS) was 1.1 years (95% CI 0.8-1.4) and was similar between patients with < 5% (n = 54, mOS = 1.4 years [0.7-2.0]), 5-19% (n = 63, mOS = 1.1 years [0.7-1.4]), and ≥ 20% CPCs (n = 59, mOS = 1.1 years [0.7-1.5], p = 0.349). As survival was similar between those with 5-19% and ≥ 20% CPCs, we stratified patients by < 5% (mOS = 1.4 years [0.7-2.0]) and ≥ 5% CPCs (mOS = 1.1 years [0.8-1.4], p = 0.154). Outcomes of those with ≥ 5% CPCs were much poorer when compared with a cohort of MM patients diagnosed between 1971 and 2016, who did not have CPCs at diagnosis (n = 9724, mOS = 4.4 yrs [4.3-4.5], p < 0.001); survival was also lower in patients diagnosed after 2001 with ≥ 5% CPCs (n = 62, mOS = 1.4 years [0.8-2.5]) compared with patients with standard risk (n = 1326, mOS = 7.5 years [7.0-8.7]) and high-risk MM (n = 381, mOS = 4.3 years [3.5-4.9], p < 0.001). We therefore propose that the definition of PCL be revised to patients with ≥ 5% CPCs on peripheral blood smear, who otherwise meet diagnostic criteria for MM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravi et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: