PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 2009Journal of Applied Psychology186 citations

Prediction of 4-year college student performance using cognitive and noncognitive predictors and the impact on demographic status of admitted students.

View Full Paper
NSNeal SchmittJKJessica KeeneyFOFrederick L. Oswald

Key Points

  • This study aims to assess the validity of cognitive and noncognitive predictors for college performance among students after four years.
  • Analyzed cognitive predictors (SAT/ACT scores and high school GPA) and noncognitive predictors (biodata, situational judgment)
  • Collected data during the first few weeks of students' freshman year to assess various performance metrics
  • Evaluated the impact of predictor types on a diverse student demographic.
  • SAT/ACT scores and high school GPA were primary predictors of cumulative GPA.
  • Noncognitive measures effectively predicted alternative outcomes such as absenteeism and organizational behavior.
  • The racial diversity of the student body varied significantly based on the combination of predictor types used in admissions.

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the validity of noncognitive and cognitive predictors of the performance of college students at the end of their 4th year in college. Results indicate that the primary predictors of cumulative college grade point average (GPA) were Scholastic Assessment Test/American College Testing Assessment (SAT/ACT) scores and high school GPA (HSGPA) though biographical data and situational judgment measures added incrementally to this prediction. SAT/ACT scores and HSGPA were collected and used in various ways by participating institutions in the admissions process while situational judgment measures and biodata were collected for research purposes only during the first few weeks of the participating students' freshman year. Alternative outcomes such as a self-report of performance on a range of student performance dimensions and a measure of organizational citizenship behavior, as well as class absenteeism, were best predicted by noncognitive measures. The racial composition of a student body selected with only cognitive measures or both cognitive and noncognitive measures under various levels of selectivity as well as the performance of students admitted under these scenarios is also reported. The authors concluded that both the biodata and situational judgment measures could be useful supplements to cognitive indexes of student potential in college admissions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Schmitt et al. (2009) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a088133afa0a1b8dbddfae3https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016810
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper