Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Theoretical analysis demonstrates restricted maximum likelihood estimation in constrained parameter models, highlighting a broadly applicable hypothesis test via random Lagrange multipliers.
The estimation of a parameter lying in a subset of a set of possible parameters is considered. This subset is the null space of a well-behaved function and the estimator considered lies in the subset and is a solution of likelihood equations containing a Lagrangian multiplier. It is proved that, under certain conditions analogous to those of Cramer, these equations have a solution which gives a local maximum of the likelihood function. The asymptotic distribution of this `restricted maximum likelihood estimator' and an iterative method of solving the equations are discussed. Finally a test is introduced of the hypothesis that the true parameter does lie in the subset; this test, which is of wide applicability, makes use of the distribution of the random Lagrangian multiplier appearing in the likelihood equations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aitchison et al. (1958) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: