Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
We present an empirically grounded method for evaluating content selection in summarization. It incorporates the idea that no single best model summary for a collection of documents exists. Our method quantifies the relative importance of facts to be conveyed. We argue that it is reliable, predictive and diagnostic, thus improves considerably over the shortcomings of the human evaluation method currently used in the Document Understanding Conference.
Nenkova et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: