Key result
NT-proBNP ≥400 pg/mL predicts major events in HFrEF equally well regardless of AF status.
Why the study?
Does the prognostic value of NT-proBNP levels differ between HFrEF patients with and without atrial fibrillation?
Cohort
Yes
Does the prognostic value of NT-proBNP levels differ between HFrEF patients with and without atrial fibrillation?
NT-proBNP levels >400 pg/mL carry similar prognostic weight for adverse cardiovascular outcomes in HFrEF patients regardless of concurrent atrial fibrillation.
Supports uniform NT-proBNP thresholds for HFrEF risk stratification irrespective of AF; leaves open prospective validation in larger cohorts.
BACKGROUND: Patients with heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) have higher circulating levels of NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) than HF patients without AF. There is uncertainty about the prognostic importance of a given concentration of NT-proBNP in HF patients with and without AF. We investigated this question in a large cohort of patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction. METHODS AND RESULTS: <0.001. We categorized patients with and without AF into 5 NT-proBNP bands: <400, 400 to 999 (reference), 1000 to 1999, 2000 to 2999, and ≥3000 pg/mL. For the primary composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, event rates differed for patients with and without AF in the lowest band (<400 pg/mL; 8.2 versus 5.0 per 100 patient-years), but not for the higher bands (400-999 pg/mL, 7.4 versus 7.7 per 100 patient-years; 1000-1999 pg/mL, 9.8 versus 11.4 per 100 patient-year; 2000-2999 pg/mL, 13.5 versus 13.4 per 100 patient-years; ≥3000 pg/mL, 22.7 versus 23.0 per 100 patient-years). These findings were consistent whether NT-proBNP was examined as a categorical or continuous variable and before and after adjustment for other prognostic variables. We found similar results for the components of the composite outcome and all-cause mortality. CONCLUSIONS: HF and reduced ejection fraction patients with AF had higher NT-proBNP than those without AF. However, above a concentration of 400 pg/mL (representing most patients in each group), NT-proBNP had similar predictive value for adverse cardiovascular outcomes, irrespective of AF status. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT00853658 (ATMOSPHERE) and NCT01035255 (PARADIGM-HF).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kristensen et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. NT-proBNP levels vs. Atrial fibrillation status was evaluated on Composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. In HFrEF patients, NT-proBNP levels ≥400 pg/mL demonstrated similar predictive value for cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization regardless of atrial fibrillation status.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: