Key result
CMR parametric mapping enables contrast-free quantitative assessment of myocardial tissue properties for clinical diagnosis.
Why the study?
CMR parametric mapping techniques have transitioned from research tools to clinical practice, creating a need to review their physical principles, clinical applications, pitfalls, and future directions.
CMR parametric mapping provides quantitative, voxel-by-voxel tissue characterization without exogenous contrast, enhancing clinical diagnosis and risk stratification of cardiac disorders.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging is widely regarded as the gold-standard technique for myocardial tissue characterization, allowing for the detection of structural abnormalities such as myocardial fatty replacement, myocardial edema, myocardial necrosis, and/or fibrosis. Historically, the identification of abnormal myocardial regions relied on variations in tissue signal intensity, often necessitating the use of exogenous contrast agents. However, over the past two decades, innovative parametric mapping techniques have emerged, enabling the direct quantitative assessment of tissue magnetic resonance (MR) properties on a voxel-by-voxel basis. These mapping techniques offer significant advantages by providing comprehensive and precise information that can be translated into color-coded maps, facilitating the identification of subtle or diffuse myocardial abnormalities. As unlikely conventional methods, these techniques do not require a substantial amount of structurally altered tissue to be visually identifiable as an area of abnormal signal intensity, eliminating the reliance on contrast agents. Moreover, these parametric mapping techniques, such as T1, T2, and T2* mapping, have transitioned from being primarily research tools to becoming valuable assets in the clinical diagnosis and risk stratification of various cardiac disorders. In this review, we aim to elucidate the underlying physical principles of CMR parametric mapping, explore its current clinical applications, address potential pitfalls, and outline future directions for research and development in this field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muser et al. (2024) conducted a review in Cardiac disorders. CMR parametric mapping (T1, T2, T2* mapping) vs. Conventional CMR methods was evaluated. CMR parametric mapping techniques, such as T1, T2, and T2* mapping, enable direct quantitative assessment of myocardial tissue properties without exogenous contrast agents for clinical diagnosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: