Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Why do R&D superstar firms—the elite few that consistently dominate global R&D investment—differ in their innovation performance? This study decomposes the variance in R&D outcomes into firm-, industry-, and institution-level effects using the strategy tripod framework. Using the EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard data of 3,444 firms from 2011 to 2022 (24,107 firm–year obs.), we introduce two novel performance metrics (i) Return on Research Capital (RORC) and (ii) Price-to-Research Ratio (PRR)in addition to (iii) R&D Intensity to capture both input- and output-based dimensions of R&D success. The results show that firm-specific effects primarily drive R&D Intensity, while industry and institutional factors explain greater variability in RORC and PRR, particularly among publicly listed firms. These findings suggest that the performance of R&D superstars is not solely firm-centric but shaped by sectoral and institutional contexts. By integrating the strategy tripod with multidimensional measures of R&D performance, this study advances understanding of what sustains superior corporate research outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lestan et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: