Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This case study elucidates a method of critical thematic analysis that the authors argue is useful as a methodological tool used to code and interpret in-depth, qualitative interview discourses. They extend Owen's (1984) articulation of thematic analysis via recurrence, repetition, and forcefulness by adding a method of closed coding that identifies the prominence of ideologies, power relations, and status-based hierarchies. This method is demonstrated through a case study of interviews with female immigrant faculty members. Critically informed themes are purposefully selected and explained, and implications for this methodological development are discussed.
Lawless et al. (Fri,) studied this question.