Why the study?
High-intensity activities such as marathon running may adversely affect cardiac morphology and function, and males and females exhibit discrepancies in cardiac response to training.
Does marathon running induce sex-specific morphological, functional, and biochemical cardiac alterations in amateur athletes?
Does marathon running induce sex-specific morphological, functional, and biochemical cardiac alterations in amateur athletes?
Marathon running induces transient, sex-specific right ventricular dilation and biomarker elevation, which are more pronounced in male amateur athletes and correlate with lower baseline fitness.
May support pre-marathon fitness assessment in male amateurs; leaves open links to long-term outcomes.
Introduction: Sport is known to have beneficial influence on cardiovascular system. However, activities of high intensity such as marathon running may adversely affect cardiac morphology and function, especially in the heterogenous group of amateur athletes. As males and females exhibit discrepancies in cardiac response to training, we aimed to compare exercise-induced myocardial alterations between sexes among 61 amateur marathon runners, with the use of evolving echocardiographic techniques and cardiac biomarkers. Methods: The study followed three stages: 2-3 weeks prior the marathon (Stage 1), at the finish line (Stage 2) and 2 weeks after the run (Stage 3). Echocardiographic examination along with blood analyses for biomarkers of cardiac injury and overload [creatine kinase, high sensitivity cardiac troponin I, heart-type fatty acid binding protein, B-type natriuretic peptide, galectin-3 (Gal-3), endothelin-1 (ET-1), interleukin-6 and neopterin] were performed at each stage. Results: max values after the race showed higher levels of Gal-3 post-run (r = -0.29; p < 0.05). Conclusion: Marathon running induces transient cardiac remodelling, more pronounced in male than female athletes. Structural and functional changes assessed by echocardiography correspond with biochemical alterations. Galectin-3 was the best biomarker to reflect overload changes. Cardiovascular screening in amateur runners should be implemented to identify subjects requiring further evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lasocka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: