Why the study?
Given the benefits of SGLT2i in protecting against heart failure in diabetic patients, the potential impact of SGLT2i on the clinical features of patients presenting with MI remained to be explored.
Does canagliflozin reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk or chronic kidney disease?
Does canagliflozin reduce the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular risk or chronic kidney disease?
Canagliflozin did not significantly reduce the overall risk of myocardial infarction in patients with type 2 diabetes, though it was associated with a lower risk of non-STEMI and a possible increase in STEMI.
Canagliflozin was not associated with lower MI risk; leaves open subtype-specific effects pending randomized confirmation.
AIMS: Given the benefits of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibition (SGLT2i) in protecting against heart failure in diabetic patients, we sought to explore the potential impact of SGLT2i on the clinical features of patients presenting with myocardial infarction (MI) through a post hoc analysis of CANVAS Programme and CREDENCE trial. METHODS AND RESULTS: Individuals with type 2 diabetes and history or high risk of cardiovascular disease (CANVAS Programme) or type 2 diabetes and chronic kidney disease (CREDENCE) were included. The intervention was canagliflozin 100 or 300 mg (combined in the analysis) or placebo. MI events were adjudicated as ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI, and type 1 MI or type 2 MI. A total of 421 first MI events in the CANVAS Programme and 178 first MI events in the CREDENCE trial were recorded (83 fatal, 128 STEMI, 431 non-STEMI, and 40 unknown). No benefit of canagliflozin compared with placebo on time to first MI event was observed [hazard ratio (HR) 0.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.75, 1.05]. Canagliflozin was associated with lower risk for non-STEMI (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.65, 0.95) but suggested a possible increase in STEMI (HR 1.55; 95% CI 1.06, 2.27), with no difference in risk of type 1 or type 2 MI. There was no change in fatal MI (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.78, 1.93). CONCLUSION: Canagliflozin was not associated with a reduction in overall MI in the pooled CANVAS Programme and CREDENCE trial population. The possible differential effect on STEMI and Non-STEMI observed in the CANVAS cohort warrants further investigation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT01032629, NCT01989754, and NCT02065791.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yu et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: