Key result
Canagliflozin did not significantly reduce the incidence of first atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter events compared with placebo (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.67-1.02).
Why the study?
To assess the effects of canagliflozin on the incidence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter and other key cardiorenal outcomes.
Does canagliflozin or SGLT2 inhibition reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular or renal risk?
RCT
randomly assigned
Does canagliflozin or SGLT2 inhibition reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter in patients with type 2 diabetes and high cardiovascular or renal risk?
Hazard Ratio: 0.82 (95% CI 0.67–1.02)
SGLT2 inhibitors as a class appear to reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation and flutter in patients with type 2 diabetes, with potential benefits concentrated in those without a prior history of the arrhythmia.
Aim To assess the effects of canagliflozin on the incidence of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) and other key cardiorenal outcomes in a pooled analysis of the CANVAS and CREDENCE trials. Materials and Methods Participants with type 2 diabetes and high risk of cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease were included and randomly assigned to canagliflozin or placebo. We explored the effects of canagliflozin on the incidence of first AF/AFL events and AF/AFL‐related complications (ischaemic stroke/transient ischaemic attack/hospitalization for heart failure). Major adverse cardiovascular events and a renal‐specific outcome by baseline AF/AFL status were analysed using Cox regression models. Results Overall, 354 participants experienced a first AF/AFL event. Canagliflozin had no detectable effect on AF/AFL (hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67‐1.02) compared with placebo. Subgroup analysis, however, suggested a possible reduction in AF/AFL in those with no AF/AFL history (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62‐0.99). Canagliflozin was also associated with a reduction in AF/AFL‐related complications (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.65‐0.86). There was no evidence of treatment heterogeneity by baseline AF/AFL history for other key cardiorenal outcomes (all P interaction > 0.14). Meta‐analysis of five sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 (SGLT2) inhibitor trials demonstrated a 19% reduction in AF/AFL events with active treatment (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72‐0.92). Conclusions Overall, a significant effect of canagliflozin on the incidence of AF/AFL events could not be shown, however, a possible reduction in AF/AFL events in those with no prior history requires further investigation. Meta‐analysis suggests SGLT2 inhibition reduces AF/AFL incidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Canagliflozin vs. placebo was evaluated on incidence of first AF/AFL events (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-1.02). Canagliflozin did not significantly reduce the incidence of first atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter events compared with placebo (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.67-1.02).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: