Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Plotinus argues that materialism cannot explain reflexive cognition. He argues that mere bodies cannot engage in the self-reflexive activity of both cognising some content and being cognitively aware of cognising this content. Short of outright denying the cognitive unity underlying this phenomenon of self-awareness, materialism is in trouble. However, Plotinus bases his argument on the condition that material bodies are capable of a spatial unity at most, and while this condition has purchase on ancient materialists, it would be rejected today. After considering objections based on our contemporary understanding of a material body, I amend Plotinus’ argument to focus instead on the core materialist commitment to external efficient-causal relations. This amended argument regains its urgency for materialism, while retaining the spirit of Plotinus’ view.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zain Raza (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: