Why the study?
Reduced biventricular pacing impairs CRT response and prognosis, but data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and reduced biventricular pacing are sparse.
Does catheter ablation improve biventricular pacing compared to intensified medical therapy in CRT patients with reduced BiVP due to ventricular arrhythmias?
Does catheter ablation improve biventricular pacing compared to intensified medical therapy in CRT patients with reduced BiVP due to ventricular arrhythmias?
In CRT patients with reduced biventricular pacing due to ventricular arrhythmias, PVC ablation is more effective than intensified medical therapy at improving pacing percentage and NYHA class.
BACKGROUND: Reduced biventricular pacing (BiVP) is a common phenomenon in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with impact on CRT-response and patients' prognosis. Data on treatment strategies for patients with ventricular arrhythmia and BiVP reduction is sparse. We sought to assess the effects of ventricular arrhythmia treatment on BiVP. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis, the data of CRT patients with a reduced BiVP ≤ 97% due to ventricular arrhythmia were analyzed. Catheter ablation or intensified medical therapy was performed to optimize BiVP. RESULTS: We included 64 consecutive patients (73 ± 10 years, 89% male, LVEF 30 ± 7%). Of those, 22/64 patients (34%) underwent ablation of premature ventricular contractions (PVC) and 15/64 patients (23%) underwent ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation while 27/64 patients (42%) received intensified medical treatment. Baseline BiVP was 88.1% ± 10.9%. An overall increase in BiVP percentage points of 8.8% (range - 5 to + 47.6%) at 6-month follow-up was achieved. No changes in left ventricular function were observed but improvement in BiVP led to an improvement in NYHA class in 24/64 patients (38%). PVC ablation led to a significantly better improvement in BiVP [9.9% (range 4 to 22%) vs. 3.2% (range - 5 to + 10.7%); p = < 0.001] and NYHA class (12/22 patients vs. 4/27 patients; p = 0.003) than intensified medical therapy. All patients with VT and reduced BiVP underwent VT ablation with an increase of BiVP of 16.3 ± 13.4%. CONCLUSION: In this evaluation of ventricular arrhythmia treatment aiming for CRT optimization, both medical therapy and catheter ablation were shown to be effective. Compared to medical therapy, a higher increase in BiVP was observed after PVC ablation, and more patients improved in NYHA class. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was registered at clinical trials.org in August 2019: NCT04065893.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruck et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: