Key result
The 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm yields only ~11% sensitivity for detecting elevated LAP in paroxysmal AF.
Why the study?
Determining fluid retention in the circulatory system remains challenging, prompting an evaluation of the sensitivity of CHF symptoms, signs, and echocardiographic criteria against invasively measured elevated atrial pressure in AF patients.
What is the sensitivity of clinical symptoms and echocardiographic criteria for detecting invasively measured elevated atrial pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=20)
No
What is the sensitivity of clinical symptoms and echocardiographic criteria for detecting invasively measured elevated atrial pressure in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Clinical symptoms and standard echocardiographic parameters have extremely low sensitivity for detecting elevated cardiac filling pressures in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, potentially leading to under-prescription of diuretics.
May miss elevated filling pressures in paroxysmal AF; leaves open validation of AF-specific thresholds before clinical use.
Determining fluid retention in circulatory system currently remains a challenge. The objective of our study was to determine the sensitivity of individual symptoms and signs of chronic heart failure (CHF) and echocardiographic criteria for detecting fluid retention in patients with atrial fibrillation and invasively measured elevated atrial pressure. Methods — We conducted a prospective study of adult patients with a history of cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease or/and arterial hypertension in combination with atrial fibrillation [AF]) hospitalized for radiofrequency catheter ablation. All patients underwent expert ultrasound examination of the heart using Philips HD 15 and Philips iE33 devices, as well as invasive measurement of pressure in the left and right atria at rest (n=20). Results — The sensitivity of dyspnea in patients with paroxysmal AF and long-standing persistent AF was 44.4% and 90.9%, respectively. The sensitivity of the mean E/e' ratio in patients with paroxysmal AF and long-standing persistent AF was 22.2% and 18.1%, correspondingly. According to the 2016 American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (ASE/EACVI) algorithm, only one patient (11.1%) in the group with paroxysmal AF and 54.5% of subjects in the group with a long-standing persistent AF type had two positive criteria. The sensitivity of lower limb edema was 0% in patients with paroxysmal AF and 57.1% in those with long-standing persistent AF. The sensitivity of IVC diameter >22 mm was 80% in patients with paroxysmal AF and 57.1% in the group with long-standing persistent AF. At the same time, the sensitivity of the IVC inspiratory collapse ≤50% was significantly lower in both groups: 60% in patients with paroxysmal AF and 42.9% in subjects with long-standing persistent AF. Conclusion — Clinical symptoms and signs of chronic heart failure (CHF), as well as echocardiographic parameters reflecting an increase in the filling pressure of the heart chambers, are characterized by extremely low sensitivity in a cohort of patients with paroxysmal AF. The use of more stringent criteria for diagnosing congestion in this group of patients leads to a significant underdiagnosis of elevated filling pressure in the left chambers of the heart, which, in turn, increases the likelihood of insufficient prescription of diuretic therapy when it is objectively necessary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Гарганеева et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation and chronic heart failure (n=20). Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation vs. Long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation was evaluated on Sensitivity of the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm (≥2 positive criteria) for detecting elevated left atrial pressure. Clinical symptoms and echocardiographic parameters for diagnosing fluid retention demonstrated extremely low sensitivity (11.1% for the 2016 ASE/EACVI algorithm) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: