Why the study?
Does left ventricular systolic function assessed by wall motion index predict all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure and/or acute myocardial infarction?
Does left ventricular systolic function assessed by wall motion index predict all-cause mortality in patients with heart failure and/or acute myocardial infarction?
Left ventricular systolic function assessed by wall motion index is a strong predictor of all-cause mortality in patients with AMI or HF, though its prognostic power is attenuated in the presence of prior HF.
Aims To study the prognostic importance of left ventricular systolic function in patients with heart failure (HF) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with respect to the presence of prior heart failure and known ischemic heart disease. Methods In 13,084 consecutive patients diagnosed with either AMI or HF, a medical history and an echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function by wall motion index (WMI) were obtained. Patients were divided into four groups: AMI with or without a history of HF, and primary HF (no recent AMI) with or without a history of ischemic heart disease (IHD). Mortality was assessed after nine years of follow-up. Results WMI stratified patients according to all-cause mortality in all four groups of patients (p< 0.0001). For a decrease in WMI of 0.3 (corresponding to a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.1), the hazard ratio was 1.61 (95% CI:1.48–1.76) for AMI patients without prior HF, 1.43 (1.38–1.48) for AMI patients with prior HF, 1.26 (1.22–1.30) for primary HF patients with IHD and 1.23 (1.18–1.27) for HF patients without IHD. Conclusion WMI stratifies patients with IHD and/or HF according to risk of all-cause death. The presence of HF attenuates the prognostic power of WMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thune et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: