Key result
Combined antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia resulted in a higher rate of spontaneous recovery of sinus rhythm compared to antegrade cardioplegia (96% vs 40%) during CABG surgery.
Why the study?
Does combined antegrade-retrograde cold crystalloid cardioplegia improve myocardial protection compared to antegrade cardioplegia in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting?
RCT (n=50)
Does combined antegrade-retrograde cold crystalloid cardioplegia improve myocardial protection compared to antegrade cardioplegia in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting?
Absolute Event Rate: 96% vs 40%
Combined antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia provides superior myocardial protection and higher rates of spontaneous sinus rhythm recovery compared to antegrade cardioplegia alone during elective CABG.
Supports combined antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia for myocardial protection in elective CABG; extends RCT evidence on delivery strategies.
This prospective randomized clinical study was designed to assess and compare the use of combined antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia versus antegrade cardioplegia in providing adequate myocardial preservation during coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Fifty patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting were randomly divided into 2 groups according to the route of cardioplegic delivery: group A (25 patients) received antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia; group B (25 patients) received combined antegrade-retrograde cold crystalloid cardioplegia. The groups were compared by clinical and electrocardiographic criteria and biochemical markers of ischemic myocardial damage. There was a highly significant statistical difference between the groups in terms of spontaneous recovery of sinus rhythm (40% of patients in group A versus 96% in group B). The use of direct current shock to restore sinus rhythm was higher in group A (60%) compared with group B (4%). Low cardiac output occurred in 20% of patients in group A and in 16% of patients in group B but this difference was not statistically significant. No bundle-branch block was found in group B whereas the incidence was 8% in group A. Significantly higher levels of biochemical markers of myocardial damage were obtained in group A at 10 minutes, 4 hours, and 12 hours after declamping. These results indicate that combined antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia is superior to antegrade cardioplegia for myocardial protection during coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aziz et al. (1998) conducted an RCT in elective coronary artery bypass grafting (n=50). combined antegrade-retrograde cold crystalloid cardioplegia vs. antegrade cold crystalloid cardioplegia was evaluated on spontaneous recovery of sinus rhythm. Combined antegrade-retrograde cardioplegia resulted in a higher rate of spontaneous recovery of sinus rhythm compared to antegrade cardioplegia (96% vs 40%) during CABG surgery.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: