Why the study?
Despite increasing clinical use, challenges to successful epicardial ablation remain, including energy source selection, irrigation optimization, and anatomic barriers such as epicardial fat and coronary vessels.
This review highlights the current challenges in epicardial ablation, including energy source selection, irrigation optimization, and anatomic barriers like epicardial fat and coronary vessels.
Persistent epicardial ablation barriers warrant caution in practice; leaves open targeted technique optimization in prospective trials.
Since their inception, percutaneous epicardial approaches have become increasingly common in clinical practice with the advent of new technology and the growth of catheter ablation for both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. In addition to identifying the arrhythmogenic foci, there remain challenges to successful epicardial ablation such as the choice of energy source, optimizing irrigation during ablation, and anatomic barriers such as epicardial fat and coronary vessels. The performance of continued translational studies to understand how each of these factors contribute to lesion formation will be essential to guide future advances in the field of epicardial ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Edward et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: