Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: Using adapted COVID-19 vaccines targeting current variants in circulation is necessary for addressing the dynamic evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Using a previously published combined Markov-decision tree model, this study estimated the outcomes of different vaccination strategies targeting various age and risk groups. The model used age-specific epidemiology, clinical, cost, and quality-of-life inputs derived from published literature and national surveillance data. Scenario analyses that included variations in COVID-19 incidence and sensitivity analyses that varied the parameters by ±20% were both conducted. RESULTS: Compared to no vaccination, the vaccination of older adults aged ≥65 years and the high-risk population was estimated to prevent 12,933 symptomatic cases, 12,811 outpatient cases, 122 hospitalizations, 353 lost quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained, and four deaths, translating to total direct and societal cost savings of US$9,424,605 and US$10,397,107 respectively. Expanding vaccination to adults aged ≥60 years and high-risk individuals further increased public health and economic benefits. Results were sensitive to assumptions regarding the underlying burden of infection, particularly underreporting. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing an adapted COVID-19 vaccine strategy for high-risk and older adults in Guatemala is projected to improve health outcomes and, under base-case assumptions, be cost-saving from both payer and societal perspectives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mendoza et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: