Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This ar ticle argues that in an age of knowing capitalism, sociologists have not adequately thought about the challenges posed to their expertise by the proliferation of `social' transactional data which are now routinely collected, processed and analysed by a wide variety of private and public institutions. Drawing on British examples, we argue that whereas over the past 40 years sociologists championed innovative methodological resources, notably the sample survey and the in-depth interviews, which reasonably allowed them to claim distinctive expertise to access the `social' in powerful ways, such claims are now much less secure. We argue that both the sample survey and the in-depth interview are increasingly dated research methods, which are unlikely to provide a robust base for the jurisdiction of empirical sociologists in coming decades. We conclude by speculating how sociology might respond to this coming crisis through taking up new interests in the `politics of method'.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Mike Savage
London School of Economics and Political Science
Roger Burrows
University of Bristol
Sociology
University of Manchester
University of York
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Savage et al. (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08c993d9bfbc371b01ed97 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038507080443