Key result
Structural heart disease linked to ~456% higher VA recurrence risk after pediatric catheter ablation.
Why the study?
Data are limited on catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias in pediatric patients, and predictors of outcomes have not been fully investigated.
Does catheter ablation prevent VA recurrence and mortality in pediatric patients with ventricular arrhythmias?
Cohort (n=81)
Does catheter ablation prevent VA recurrence and mortality in pediatric patients with ventricular arrhythmias?
Effect estimate: HR 5.56 (95% CI 2.68-11.54)
p-value: p=<.001
Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias is effective and safe in pediatric patients, with structural heart disease being the strongest independent predictor of recurrence.
Structural heart disease signals higher recurrence risk after pediatric ventricular arrhythmia ablation; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective trials before guiding practice.
BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are rare in pediatric patients, especially in absence of structural heart disease (SHD). Few data are available regarding the invasive VAs treatment with catheter ablation (CA) in pediatric patients and predictors of outcomes have not been fully investigated. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical presentation, procedural characteristics, and outcomes in pediatric patients undergoing CA for VAs. METHODS: Eighty-one consecutive pediatric patients (58 male [72%], 15.5 ± 2.2 years) treated by CA for ventricular tachycardia (VT) or premature ventricular beats (PVBs) were retrospectively evaluated. Study endpoints were VAs recurrence and mortality for any cause. RESULTS: Ninety-five procedures were performed in 81 patients, 52 (55%) PVBs and 43 (45%) VT ablations. During a follow-up of 35.0 months (interquartile range = 13.0-71.0), 14 patients (14.7%) had a VA recurrence: 11 (33.3%) patients treated with CA for VT and 3 (6.2%) patients treated for PVBs (p < .001). One patient (1%) died 26 months after the procedure during an electrical storm. Patients with SHD had higher VAs recurrence rate, as compared with idiopathic VAs (pairwise log-rank p < .001). Patients treated with CA for VT had higher VA recurrence rate, as compared with PVB patients (pairwise log-rank p = .002). At Cox multivariate analysis only SHD was an independent predictor of VAs recurrence (hazard ratio = 5.56, 95% confidence interval = 2.68-11.54, p < .001). CONCLUSION: CA of VAs is effective and safe in a pediatric population. CA of idiopathic and fascicular VAs are associated with lower recurrence rate, than VAs in the setting of SHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gulletta et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Ventricular arrhythmias (n=81). Catheter ablation was evaluated on VAs recurrence and mortality for any cause (HR 5.56, 95% CI 2.68-11.54, p=<.001). Structural heart disease was an independent predictor of ventricular arrhythmia recurrence after catheter ablation in pediatric patients (HR 5.56; 95% CI 2.68-11.54; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: