Key result
Female sex is linked to ~20% more hospitalizations and higher pharmacy costs in symptomatic obstructive HCM.
Why the study?
Previous studies reported worse clinical burden for female patients with symptomatic oHCM, but whether this translates to increased healthcare resource use and cost remained unknown.
Does female sex increase healthcare resource use and economic burden in adult patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared to male sex?
Observational (n=9,490)
Yes
Does female sex increase healthcare resource use and economic burden in adult patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy compared to male sex?
Female patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy experience significantly higher rates of healthcare resource utilization and pharmacy costs compared to male patients, highlighting a sex-based disparity in disease burden.
May inform sex-stratified resource allocation in symptomatic obstructive HCM; leaves open underlying drivers and intervention efficacy.
Background Previous studies of patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) have reported worse clinical burden for female patients; whether this translates to an increase in healthcare resource use (HRU) and cost is unknown. Therefore, we evaluated the impact of sex on economic burden in symptomatic oHCM. Methods Medical and pharmacy claims data were assessed from 2016 to 2021 to identify (ICD-10 code) adult patients with symptomatic oHCM in the United States. Generalized linear models were used to estimate HCM-related cost and generalized estimating equations for HRU [both reported as mean per-person-per-year (PPPY)] for healthcare categories: inpatient, outpatient, emergency room (ER), urgent care, and pharmacy. Cox proportional hazard regressions were used to compare differences in male and female patients with symptomatic HCM. Results Among 9,490 patients with symptomatic oHCM, 5,309 (55.9%) were female. Female patients were older (64 ± 13 vs. 59 ± 14), with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (1.9 vs. 1.7) compared to males, respectively. After adjusting for patient characteristics, female patients had significantly greater number of HCM-related hospitalizations (0.24 vs. 0.20 PPPY, p = 0.0014), LOS (5.08 vs. 4.30 PPPY; p = 0.0235), number of outpatient visits (4.98 vs. 4.59 PPPY; p = 0.0387), and number of distinct drugs (0.59 vs. 0.55 PPPY; p = 0.0010), compared with males, respectively. In adjusted models, only HCM-related pharmacy costs were significant, with female patients having slightly higher costs compared to males ($70 vs. $61 PPPY; p = 0.0465). There were no significant differences in all-cause costs of care between male and female patients with oHCM. Conclusions Female patients with symptomatic oHCM experience greater rates of HCM-related and all-cause hospitalizations and number of prescriptions, and HCM-related length of stay, outpatient visits, and pharmacy costs compared to male patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Butzner et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) (n=9,490). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on HCM-related hospitalizations (per-person-per-year) (p=0.0014). Female patients with symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy had significantly higher rates of HCM-related hospitalizations (0.24 vs. 0.20 PPPY) and pharmacy costs than male patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: