Key result
T2DM with normal LV function is linked to ~38% higher transversal hemodynamic force strength.
Why the study?
Early detection of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with T2DM is essential before overt changes in LVEF and myocardial strain develop.
Does hemodynamic force analysis using routine CMR detect subclinical myocardial dysfunction in asymptomatic T2DM patients with normal LV function?
Cross-Sectional (n=113)
No
Does hemodynamic force analysis using routine CMR detect subclinical myocardial dysfunction in asymptomatic T2DM patients with normal LV function?
Absolute Event Rate: 3.6% vs 2.6%
p-value: p=<0.001
HDF analysis may flag subclinical dysfunction in asymptomatic T2DM with preserved LV function; leaves open its clinical utility.
Background Early detection of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in asymptomatic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is essential before overt changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and myocardial strain occur. The objective of this study is to quantitatively assess hemodynamic forces (HDFs) using a rigorous mathematical model based on conventional cine cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images in patients with T2DM, and investigate their correlation with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and duration of diabetes. Methods We recruited 63 T2DM patients and 50 healthy volunteers to undergo contrast-enhanced CMR examinations. T2DM patients were divided into three groups according to the course of disease: early, middle and later stage (time <5 years, 5 ≤ time <10 years, time ≥10 years, respectively). LV deformation parameters, global circumferential strain (LVGCS), radial strain (LVGRS), longitudinal strain (LVGLS) and HDFs parameters such as longitudinal (apical-basal/A-B), transversal (lateral-septal/L-S) HDF strength (RMS) were measured and compared among the three groups. Results Compared with healthy volunteers, no significant differences in LV function and strains were observed ( P > 0.05), while HDF Strength (RMS) L-S (%) were significantly higher in T2DM patients ( p < 0.001). LVGLS was significantly decreased in late T2DM patients ( p < 0.05), but HDF Strength (RMS) L-S (%) was significantly increased compared with early T2DM patients. Both HDF Strength (RMS) L-S (%) and HDF Strength (RMS) A-B (%) value were independently related to the extent of LGE ( β = 0.435, p = 0.001; β = −0.329 , p = 0.006, respectively). In addition, HDF Strength (RMS) L-S (%) was also independently correlated with insulin treatment( β = 0.291, p = 0.013). Conclusions HDF analysis can provide valuable insights into subclinical myocardial dysfunction prior to changes in ejection fraction and myocardial strain, suggesting that HDF analysis may be a potential early marker of subclinical myocardial dysfunction. LVGLS damage is gradually obvious with the prolongation of diabetes duration in T2DM patients. HDFs parameters are associated with the extent of LGE, and the transversal component of HDF increased with the duration of diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shao et al. (2025) conducted a cross-sectional in Type 2 diabetes mellitus with normal LV function (n=113). Type 2 diabetes mellitus (Exposure) vs. Healthy controls was evaluated on Transversal hemodynamic force strength (HDF Strength RMS L-S) (p=<0.001). In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal left ventricular function, transversal hemodynamic force strength was significantly higher compared to healthy controls (3.6% vs 2.6%, p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: