A combination of atrial fibrillation, joint disorders, and HFpEF was the strongest predictor of ATTR-CM in a real-world heart failure population (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.28-3.22).
Observational (n=3,127)
No
Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) (n=3,127)
Natural language processing (NLP) of electronic health records vs Non-ATTR-CM heart failure patients
Combination predictor of atrial fibrillation, joint disorders, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction — OR 2.03 (1.28-3.22)
Effect estimate: OR 2.03 (95% CI 1.28-3.22)
Absolute Event Rate: 29% vs 18%
AIMS: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM), a progressive and fatal cardiomyopathy, is frequently misdiagnosed or entails diagnostic delays, hindering patients from timely treatment. This study aimed to generate a systematic framework based on data from electronic health records (EHRs) to assess patients with ATTR-CM in a real-world population of heart failure (HF) patients. Predictive factors or combinations of predictive factors related to ATTR-CM in a European population were also assessed. METHODS AND RESULTS: Retrospective unstructured and semi-structured data from EHRs of patients from OLV Hospital Aalst, Belgium (2012-20), were processed using natural language processing (NLP) to generate an Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership Common Data Model database. NLP model performance was assessed on a random subset of EHRs by comparing algorithm outputs to a physician-generated standard (using precision, recall, and their harmonic mean, or F1-score). Of the 3127 HF patients, 103 potentially had ATTR-CM (age 78 ± 9 years; male 55%; ejection fraction of 48% ± 16). The mean diagnostic delay between HF and ATTR-CM diagnosis was 1.8 years. Besides HF and cardiomyopathy-related phenotypes, the strongest cardiac predictor was atrial fibrillation (AF; 72% in ATTR-CM vs. 60% in non-ATTR-CM, P = 0.02), whereas the strongest non-cardiac predictor was carpal tunnel syndrome (21% in ATTR-CM vs. 3% in non-ATTR-CM, P < 0.001). The strongest combination predictor was AF, joint disorders, and HF with preserved ejection fraction (29% in ATTR-CM vs. 18% in non-ATTR-CM: odds ratio = 2.03, 95% confidence interval = 1.28-3.22). CONCLUSIONS: Not only well-known variables associated with ATTR-CM but also unique combinations of cardiac and non-cardiac phenotypes are able to predict ATTR-CM in a real-world HF population, aiding in early identification of ATTR-CM patients.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Ana Moyá
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Clara L. Oeste
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas
Monika Beles
Cardiovascular Research Center
ESC Heart Failure
University of Naples Federico II
Federico II University Hospital
Onze Lieve Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Moyá et al. (Tue,) conducted a observational in Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) (n=3,127). Natural language processing (NLP) of electronic health records vs. Non-ATTR-CM heart failure patients was evaluated on Combination predictor of atrial fibrillation, joint disorders, and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.28-3.22). A combination of atrial fibrillation, joint disorders, and HFpEF was the strongest predictor of ATTR-CM in a real-world heart failure population (OR 2.03; 95% CI 1.28-3.22).
synapsesocial.com/papers/6a08f461a2bc65e38873a7f1 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.14517
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: