Key result
European analysis highlights networking and organizational landscape as major themes in organizing ID sports.
Why the study?
Athletes with intellectual disabilities face limitations accessing a comprehensive range of sports, and current knowledge regarding how sport is organized across European countries was needed.
Cross-Sectional (n=29)
Yes
The study highlights different models of development and examples of good practice in organizing sports for people with intellectual disabilities across Europe.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform ID sport policy via networking themes; leaves open effects on participation or health outcomes.
Opportunities to participate and compete in sports for athletes with intellectual disability (ID) have increased; however, this group still encounters limitations in accessing a comprehensive range of sports. This study addressed the current knowledge on how sport for people with ID is organized and the relationships between the major sport organizations for people with ID across 10 European countries. The participants were 29 national sport organizations for people with ID. Data were collected using semistructured interviews with representatives from the key organizations and analyzed thematically. From the results, two major themes emerged: (a) connection and networking between sport organizations and (b) organizational landscape of each nation (i.e., ID, multidisability, or mainstream). The results of this study contribute to understanding how sport for people with ID is organized across the participating nations, demonstrating different models of development and examples of good practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marin‐Urquiza et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Intellectual disability (n=29). An analysis of 29 national sport organizations across 10 European countries identified connection/networking and organizational landscape as major themes in organizing sport for people with ID.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: