Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Are we now living in a new geological epoch called the Anthropocene? Geo-scientists discuss whether there is a need for a new concept covering the last 250 years' immense human impact on the earth. How are we going to understand and define ‘heritage’ and archaeology in a rapidly changing global environment? The ‘linguistic turn’ in humanities and social sciences has had a huge impact on both archaeology and heritage studies since c. 1980. A critique is raised against the anti-essentialist view that heritage is constructed, not discovered. Furthermore, the paper discusses the legacy of ‘the linguistic turn’, post-processualism and environmental archaeology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Solli et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: