Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We apply two variants of Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to reconstruct the Type Ia supernova absolute magnitude M B ( z ) from joint BAO and supernova data under four cosmological models (ΛCDM, CPL, GEDE, Λ s CDM) and two DESI DR2 fiducial sets. A heteroscedastic single-network method tested across four constraint configurations establishes that the Etherington distance duality relation is a more fundamental constraint than cosmological model priors, reducing internal inconsistencies by up to an order of magnitude. Under full constraints all models recover M B ≈ − 19.3 mag with biases below 0.05 mag. A Fisher information-weighted two-network variant trains independent networks on BAO and SN data, providing clean probe separation; it finds no significant pointwise M B evolution in z ∈ [0.3, 1.5], but reveals a systematic separation of redshift-binned M B distributions. The heteroscedastic method identifies a persistent 2–3 σ residual at z ∼ 0.4–0.5 that is consistent across all four models and both fiducials, implying the same underlying tension. While the origin of this feature remains ambiguous, its model-independence and cross-method consistency warrant further investigation with forthcoming data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denitsa Staicova (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: