Key result
Isolated type II endoleaks post-EVAR linked to ~105% more secondary endovascular procedures at 5 years.
Why the study?
The study aimed to report the incidence, natural history, and outcome of type II endoleaks in a large prospective real-world cohort.
Does an isolated type II endoleak affect clinical outcomes and survival in patients undergoing infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair?
Cohort
Yes
Does an isolated type II endoleak affect clinical outcomes and survival in patients undergoing infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Isolated type II endoleaks after EVAR are common and associated with more secondary interventions but do not negatively impact 5-year overall survival or 1-year health status.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report the incidence, natural history, and outcome of type II endoleaks in the largest prospective real-world cohort to date. METHODS: Patients were extracted from the prospective Endurant Stent Graft Natural Selection Global Postmarket Registry (ENGAGE). Two groups were analyzed: first, patients with an isolated type II endoleak; and second, patients with a type II endoleak who later presented with a type I endoleak. A health status analysis between patients with an early type II endoleak and patients with no endoleak was performed. Second, an attempt was made to identify risk factors in patients with a type II endoleak who later presented with a type I endoleak. RESULTS: Through 5 years of follow-up, a total of 197 (15.6%) patients with isolated type II endoleaks were identified. Most were detected within the first 30 days (n = 73 [37.1%]) and through the first year (n = 73 [37.1%]), with the remainder being detected after 1 year of follow-up (n = 51 [25.8%]). Patients with a type II endoleak had a higher incidence of aneurysm growth and more secondary endovascular procedures (15.4% vs 7.5% at 5 years; P < .001). Overall survival was higher in the isolated type II endoleak group compared with patients with no endoleak (77.2% vs 67.0% at 5 years; P = .010). Twenty-two patients (10%) with a type II endoleak were diagnosed with a late type I endoleak (type IA, n = 10; type IB, n = 12), with a secondary intervention rate of 67.5% through 5 years. There was no difference in health status scores between patients with an early type II endoleak and patients without any type of endoleak at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In the ENGAGE registry, isolated type II endoleaks are present in 15.6% of patients during follow-up. The majority do not require secondary intervention, and an early isolated type II endoleak does not have an impact on health status through 1 year. However, a small group of patients with a type II endoleak will present with a type I endoleak, resulting in a high secondary intervention rate and significant risk of aneurysm-related complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dijkstra et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Infrarenal endovascular aneurysm repair. Isolated type II endoleak vs. No endoleak was evaluated on Secondary endovascular procedures (p=< .001). Isolated type II endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair were associated with a higher rate of secondary endovascular procedures at 5 years compared to no endoleak (15.4% vs 7.5%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: