Key result
Stand-alone blood flow restriction fails to improve ankle strength or function in chronic ankle instability.
Why the study?
Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training has gained popularity in athletes and rehabilitation, but its effect as a stand-alone treatment on muscle strength, dynamic balance, and physical function in female patients with chronic ankle instability was unknown.
Does blood flow restriction as a stand-alone treatment improve muscle strength, dynamic balance, and physical function in female patients with chronic ankle instability?
RCT (n=39)
Randomly allocated
Does blood flow restriction as a stand-alone treatment improve muscle strength, dynamic balance, and physical function in female patients with chronic ankle instability?
p-value: p=> .006
Blood flow restriction as a stand-alone treatment does not improve muscle strength, dynamic balance, or physical function in females with chronic ankle instability compared to rehabilitation programs.
Stand-alone blood flow restriction should not be used for chronic ankle instability in females; confirms rehabilitation as essential for strength and balance gains.
BACKGROUND: Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) training has gained popularity as a novel training strategy in athletes and rehabilitation settings in recent years. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether BFR as a stand-alone treatment would affect muscle strength, dynamic balance, and physical function in female patients with chronic ankle instability (CAI). METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with CAI were randomly allocated into 1 of 3 groups: BFR as a stand-alone (BFR) group, BFR with rehabilitation (BFR+R) group, and rehabilitation (R) group. All groups trained 3 times per week for 4 weeks. One week before and after the intervention, strength of muscles around ankle joint, 3 dynamic balance indices: Overall Stability Index, Anterior-Posterior Stability Index, and Medial-Lateral Stability Index, and physical function were assessed via an isokinetic dynamometer, the Biodex Balance System, and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index, respectively. RESULTS: The strength of muscles around ankle and dynamic balance indices improved significantly in BFR + R and R groups (P < .006), but not in BFR group (P > .006). All dynamic balance indices showed improvement in BFR + R and R groups except the Medial-Lateral Stability Index (P > .006). Foot and Ankle Disability Index increased significantly in BFR + R and R groups (P < .006), however; no improvement occurred in BFR group (P > .006). CONCLUSIONS: The BFR as a stand-alone treatment hasn't the ability to improve the strength of muscles around the ankle, dynamic balance, and physical function in females with CAI compared to the BFR + R or the R program. In addition, the strength of muscles around the ankle correlated significantly with both dynamic balance and physical function in BFR + R and R groups.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmoud et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Chronic ankle instability (n=39). Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) as a stand-alone treatment vs. BFR with rehabilitation (BFR+R) and rehabilitation (R) was evaluated on Strength of muscles around ankle joint, dynamic balance indices, and physical function (p=> .006). Blood flow restriction as a stand-alone treatment did not improve ankle muscle strength, dynamic balance, or physical function in females with chronic ankle instability (P > .006).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: