Key result
PPI use in patients on clopidogrel-based DAPT nearly doubles to ~69% over a decade.
Why the study?
Omeprazole and esomeprazole increase cardiovascular event rates when co-administered with clopidogrel, prompting examination of trends in antisecretory agent use and concomitant inhibiting PPI use with clopidogrel-based DAPT after PCI.
What are the temporal trends in the use of antisecretory agents among patients on clopidogrel-based DAPT after PCI?
Observational (n=23,134)
What are the temporal trends in the use of antisecretory agents among patients on clopidogrel-based DAPT after PCI?
Absolute Event Rate: 69% vs 34.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
There has been a steady and concerning increase in the concomitant use of inhibiting PPIs and clopidogrel-based DAPT after PCI from 2009 to 2020, despite known risks of cardiovascular events.
Rising inhibiting PPI use with clopidogrel DAPT warrants prescribing review; leaves open net clinical impact in real-world cohorts.
Abstract Background: Antisecretory drugs are commonly prescribed with clopidogrel-based dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to prevent gastrointestinal bleeding in high-risk patients after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, omeprazole and esomeprazole (inhibiting proton pump inhibitors [PPIs]) increase cardiovascular event rates on co-administration with clopidogrel. This study aimed to examine trends in the use of antisecretory agents in patients administered clopidogrel-based DAPT and the concomitant use of clopidogrel and inhibiting PPIs. Methods: We used National Inpatient Sample data compiled by the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service from 2009 to 2020. Further, we identified patients who were prescribed clopidogrel-based DAPT after PCI and investigated the concomitant use of antisecretory agents with clopidogrel. To verify the annual trend of drug utilization, we used the Cochran–Armitage trend test. Results: From 2009 to 2020, the percentage of H2 receptor antagonists users decreased steadily (from 82.5 % in 2009 to 25.3 % in 2020); instead, the percentage of PPI users increased (from 34.7 % in 2009 to 69.0 % in 2020). The use of inhibiting PPI also increased (from 4.2 % in 2009 to 30.7 % in 2020). P-CAB was rarely used before 2019; however, in 2020, it accounted for 7.8 % of the antisecretory users. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates that the use of inhibiting PPIs increased steadily in patients administered clopidogrel-based DAPT therapy. This is a major concern since the concomitant use of inhibiting PPIs with clopidogrel could increase the risk of cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Percutaneous coronary intervention requiring clopidogrel-based DAPT (n=23,134). Antisecretory agents (PPIs, H2RAs, P-CABs) vs. Temporal comparison (2009 vs 2020) was evaluated on Temporal trend in the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (p=<0.001). Between 2009 and 2020, the use of proton pump inhibitors among patients on clopidogrel-based DAPT increased from 34.7% to 69.0%, with inhibiting PPIs rising from 4.2% to 30.7%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: