Key result
Macrotroponin is linked to ~68% lower ACS risk and better survival in elevated troponin patients.
Why the study?
Macrotroponin causes discrepancies between high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays, but its clinical significance remains unclear.
Does the presence of macrotroponin affect clinical diagnosis and the diagnostic performance of different hs-cTn assays in community patients with elevated hs-cTnI?
Cohort (n=188)
Does the presence of macrotroponin affect clinical diagnosis and the diagnostic performance of different hs-cTn assays in community patients with elevated hs-cTnI?
Absolute Event Rate: 9% vs 28%
In community patients with elevated troponin, the presence of macrotroponin is common and is associated with multifactorial or indeterminate causes rather than acute coronary syndrome, which significantly affects the diagnostic performance of different troponin assays.
Macrotroponin may confound hs-cTnI interpretation in community patients; leaves open assay-specific diagnostic adjustments pending prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Macrotroponin is an important cause of discrepancy between current high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) assays, however, its clinical significance is unclear. This study examined the effects of macrotroponin and repeat testing by different hs-cTnI assays in a cohort of community patients with elevated hs-cTnI. METHODS: The first residual serum specimen from each patient in the community admitted to hospital with elevated hs-cTnI (Siemens hs-cTnI Centaur) was retested after immunoglobulin depletion and by 5 other hs-cTn assays. Low recovery of cTnI (<40%) following immunoglobulin depletion was considered as macrotroponin. A retrospective chart review was performed for these participants. Investigator-adjudicated diagnosis served as the reference standard. RESULTS: In our cohort of community patients with elevated troponin (n = 188), participants with macrotroponin (n = 99) often had a multifactorial or indeterminate myocardial injury (56% vs 25%) and were less likely to have acute coronary syndrome (9% vs 28%). On repeat testing of cTn on other platforms, better diagnostic performance (c-statistics) for ischemic and non-ischemic cardiac causes was observed on the Beckman Access hs-cTnI (0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-0.81) or the Abbott hs-cTnI Architect (0.75; CI 0.68-0.82) compared to the Siemens hs-cTnI Vista (0.62; CI 0.54-0.70; P < 0.05). This could be attributed to differences in assay reactivity for macrotroponin. Interestingly, better diagnostic performance was observed in patients without macrotroponin. Although a small number of deaths occurred (n = 16), participants with macrotroponin had better overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: In the low-risk setting, the presence of macrotroponin was clinically associated with multifactorial or indeterminate causes of troponin elevation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lam et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Elevated cardiac troponin (n=188). Presence of macrotroponin vs. Absence of macrotroponin was evaluated on Acute coronary syndrome. In community patients with elevated troponin, the presence of macrotroponin was associated with a lower likelihood of acute coronary syndrome (9% vs 28%) and better overall survival.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: